By David Leatherbarrow, Mohsen Mostafavi

Visually, many modern structures both mirror their platforms of creation or don't forget previous kinds and motifs. This department among creation and illustration is in many ways an extension of that among modernity and culture. during this e-book, David Leatherbarrow and Mohsen Mostafavi discover ways in which layout can benefit from construction tools such that structure is neither self sufficient of nor ruled by means of technology.Leatherbarrow and Mostafavi start with the theoretical and functional isolation of the construction floor because the topic of architectural layout. The autonomy of the skin, the "free facade," presumes a contrast among the structural and nonstructural parts of the construction, among the body and the cladding. as soon as the surface of the development turned autonomous of its constitution, it will probably simply in addition grasp like a curtain, or like garments. the point of interest of the connection among constitution and dermis is the architectural floor. In tracing the dealing with of this floor, the authors study either modern structures and people of the new previous. Architects mentioned contain Albert Kahn, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Alison and Peter Smithson, Alejandro de l. a. Sota, Robert Venturi, Jacques Herzog, and Pierre de Meuron.The houses of a building's floor -- if it is made up of concrete, steel, glass, or different fabrics -- usually are not basically superficial; they build the spatial results through which structure communicates. via its surfaces a construction proclaims either its autonomy and its participation in its surroundings.

Show description

Read or Download Surface Architecture PDF

Similar design books

Optimum Design of Structures: With Special Reference to Alternative Loads Using Geometric Programming

This e-book provides the built-in technique of research and optimum layout of buildings. This process, that's less complicated than the so-called nested strategy, has the trouble of producing a wide optimization challenge. to beat this challenge a technique of decomposition by way of multilevel is built.

Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors: A Materials Guide to Design and Optimization

This e-book addresses the real actual phenomenon of floor Plasmon Resonance or floor Plasmon Polaritons in skinny steel movies, a phenomenon that's exploited within the layout of a giant number of physico-chemical optical sensors. during this therapy, the most important fabrics points for layout and optimization of SPR sensors are investigated and defined intimately.

Multifunctional Polymeric Nanocomposites Based on Cellulosic Reinforcements

Multifunctional Polymeric Nanocomposites in response to Cellulosic Reinforcements introduces the cutting edge functions of polymeric fabrics in keeping with nanocellulose, and covers extraction equipment, functionalization methods, and meeting how you can permit those purposes. The ebook offers the state of the art of this novel nano-filler and the way it allows new functions in lots of various sectors, past present items.

Extra resources for Surface Architecture

Sample text

Kahn. If monumentality is a spiritual quality that conveys a sense of eternity, as Kahn argued in the first lines of his paper, then architecture can (and will) achieve this through the building’s structure and materials. ” To do so requires the risk of thinking monumentality anew: “no architect can rebuild a cathedral of another epoch . . ” Instead, architects must embrace the methods and materials of modern times. Kahn believed that modernity was vividly figured in contemporary industry, especially war industry: “war engineering achievements in concrete, steel and wood are showing the signs of maturity appropriate to guide the minds entrusted with the conception of [the cathedral of our time].

As a result, the dimension of the piers is reduced and the size of the windows increased. While this combination of iron columns and masonry piers is not a genuine structural frame, it is significant because it involved no attempt to represent a load-bearing wall. To the contrary, what was emphasized were the points of intersection between the vertical and horizontal members, apparently denying the impact of gravity. Perhaps the distinction between wall and frame in the Auditorium and the First Leiter buildings is related to the distinction between a civic and a commercial structure—assuming that both architects designed their facades in consideration of expectations of facade treatment according to building type.

This view easily accommodated the technical and aesthetic characteristics of the frame, but also those of its infill—the substitute for walling that would develop into cladding. From the outset of the development of the frame in Chicago, architects struggled with the tension between representation of the wall, as an outmoded form of construction, and the frame as an outgrowth of contemporary production. This tension is apparent in the contrast between two buildings constructed in 1889: the Auditorium Building by Adler and Sullivan and the First Leiter Building by William Le Baron Jenney.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.45 of 5 – based on 35 votes