By Chao Wang

Abstraction Refinement for big Scale version Checking summarizes contemporary study on abstraction suggestions for version checking huge electronic procedure. contemplating either the dimensions of present day electronic structures and the potential of state of the art verification algorithms, abstraction is the single plausible resolution for the profitable software of version checking innovations to industrial-scale designs. This booklet describes contemporary examine advancements in automated abstraction refinement ideas. The suite of algorithms provided during this publication has proven major development over previous artwork; a few of them have already been followed via the EDA businesses of their commercial/in-house verification instruments.

Show description

Read or Download Abstraction Refinement for Large Scale Model Checking PDF

Similar cad books

AutoCAD 2010 and AutoCAD LT 2010 Bible

On web page 30 to 32 there's a part explaining the right way to use a template i will not even stick to it i've been utilizing AutoCAD given that AutoCAD 10. It says make adjustments on your template as you notice healthy and it is for a newbie no point out of limits, textual content type layers and so forth. its placing the cart method sooner than the pony

Statistical performance analysis and modeling techniques for nanometer VLSI designs

When you consider that procedure version and chip functionality uncertainties became extra reported as applied sciences reduce into the nanometer regime, actual and effective modeling or characterization of adaptations from the gadget to the structure point became valuable for the winning layout of VLSI chips.

Inhibitory Rules in Data Analysis: A Rough Set Approach

This monograph is dedicated to theoretical and experimental research of inhibitory determination and organization ideas. Inhibitory ideas comprise at the right-hand facet a relation of the type "attribut doesn't equivalent value". using inhibitory ideas rather than deterministic (standard) ones permits us to explain extra thoroughly details encoded in determination or info structures and to layout classifiers of top of the range.

Advanced Customization in Architectural Design and Construction

This booklet provides the cutting-edge in complex customization in the quarter of architectural layout and development, explaining vital new applied sciences which are boosting layout, product and strategy innovation and picking out the demanding situations to be faced as we flow towards a mass customization building undefined.

Extra resources for Abstraction Refinement for Large Scale Model Checking

Example text

There are also CTL properties that cannot be expressed in LTL; an example in this category would be AG Efp. Both LTL and CTL are strict subsets of the more general CTL* logic [EH83, EL87]. 4. In this book, we focus primarily on LTL model checking. Readers who are interested in CTL model checking are referred to [CES86, McM94] or the book [CGP99]. 4. The relationship among LTL, CTL, and CTL* We have used the term universal property during previous discussions. Now we give a formal definition of universal and existential properties.

The exponential blow-up comes from the translation from LTL formulae to Biichi automata. However, this is often acceptable in practice, because user specified LTL formulae are usually small compared to the size of the model. In the automata-theoretic approach, we can use the labeled generalized Biichi automata as a unified representation for the model K, the property automaton vA-^^, as well as the composed system(K||^-,0). A labeled generalized Biichi automaton is simply a Kripke structure augmented by a set of acceptance conditions.

18 A Computational Tree Logic (CTL) formula is defined recursively as follows: DEFINITION 2A • atomic propositions are CTL formulae; ^ if ^ and i/j are CTL formulae, then ^^, (p AI/J, and (pW I/J are CTL formulae; • if(f and ip are CTL formulae, then EXcp, Eipl} (p, and EG 99 are CTL formulae. A CTL formula is in the normal form if negation appears only in front of propositional formulae. Formula -^AXp is not in the normal form since negation is ahead of the temporal operator AX; on the other hand, the equivalent formula EX-^p is in the normal form.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.18 of 5 – based on 16 votes